tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7321349.post3155715418318011690..comments2024-03-18T22:21:33.261-07:00Comments on The Debate Link: My Thoughts on the Weiss ResignationDavid Schraubhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04946653376744012423noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7321349.post-65343225476003276932020-07-21T17:24:56.361-07:002020-07-21T17:24:56.361-07:00The NY Times Op Ed page has Douthat, Brooks, and S...The NY Times Op Ed page has Douthat, Brooks, and Stephens as conservative voices already. Who do they have to the left of Paul Krugman? If there are viewpoints that need to be exposed to the patrons of the Times, I would argue they need exposure to Progressive/Leftist views more than still more Conservative columnists.Larry Lennhoffhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06578073969473815180noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7321349.post-81609269887549399692020-07-19T02:54:05.705-07:002020-07-19T02:54:05.705-07:00Your last point is particularly important and thos...Your last point is particularly important and those dynamics apply to so many conservative columnists (David Brooks, etc.). They don't honestly express the movement's positions, but they do plenty of PR for conservatism all the same. Batocchiohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02193752396025012825noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7321349.post-76322733276137533072020-07-15T11:33:43.352-07:002020-07-15T11:33:43.352-07:00I generally agree with all of your points. I'm...I generally agree with all of your points. I'm especially baffled as to why she, a writer who specialized in covering campus culture, open debate, and its enemies, never seemed to grapple with her own undergraduate activities. In the hands of a skilled and thoughtful essayist, that could make for very interesting reading.long time readerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13352098709752808891noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7321349.post-28900691300147978272020-07-14T19:15:29.711-07:002020-07-14T19:15:29.711-07:00Well written.
I think your last point has more to...Well written.<br /><br />I think your last point has more to do with the fire she was under as well as her quick rising star, than an antisemitic misogyny. You are known by your enemies in most businesses and it feels like her enemies were as likely to be jewish women as anyone else.<br /><br />The 3rd points asks us to accept that the scholars she targeted at Columbia were/are antisemites. I don’t know that would be universally accepted as fact as your essay states.Good Workhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09366909534374885725noreply@blogger.com