tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7321349.post4796581731932919293..comments2024-03-18T22:21:33.261-07:00Comments on The Debate Link: What's Not Being SaidDavid Schraubhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04946653376744012423noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7321349.post-12654312348051825612012-06-13T08:09:17.609-07:002012-06-13T08:09:17.609-07:00The burden is on the contrarian, and the contraria...<i>The burden is on the contrarian, and the contrarian who truly revels in the contrarian's role will accept that burden as an obligation to do more, not a license to do less.</i><br /><br />I'm inclined to agree with that (being temperamentally conservative), but I wonder if Coates really believes it. <a href="http://www.blogdenovo.org/archives/001368.html" rel="nofollow">When a preference for opposite-sex couples as parents was "common sense,"</a> did Coates say that people fighting that assumption had the burden?PGhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09381347581328622706noreply@blogger.com