Pages

Friday, December 10, 2004

Equality of Oppurtunity

Over at the relatively new Left2Right blog, Don Herzog (Professor of Law at the University of Michigan) has put up an interesting post on Equality of Oppurtunity. The only way that capitalism, and indeed liberalism, can be morally justified is if every person has an equal oppurtunity, at the start, to succeed. Just as privileges based on rank or title are abhorrent to a just and meritocratic system, so are priviliges and handicaps based on class or place of birth. So, while removing legal privileges and handicaps are part of the solution, they are not the whole. Herzog writes:
"It's not enough to stop handicapping some runners and privileging others. Equality of opportunity seems to depend on some version of equality of starting points. If the son of J. Paul Getty starts life with millions and goes to a fabulous school, and you start life in Watts and go to a "school" that is mostly about social control, it's worse than facetious to say, "okay, the two of you now should run the race; ready, set, go!" Yes, it's possible that you'll beat out the wealthy kid. But those of us who are standing on the sidelines betting will require pretty long odds to take you. Head starts in the race aren't fair, either.

This argument, and variations of it, are the best I've heard in favor of Affirmative Action. Cheryl I. Harris, Assistant Professor of Law notes:
"Brown I's dialectical contradiction was that it dismantled an old form of whiteness as property while simultaneously permitting its reemergence in a more subtle form. White privilege accorded as a legal right was rejected, but de facto white privilege not mandated by law remained unaddressed. In failing to clearly expose the real inequities produced by segregation, the status quo of substantive disadvantage was ratified as an accepted and acceptable base line -- a neutral state operating to the disadvantage of Blacks long after de jure segregation had ceased to do so. [n202] In accepting substantial inequality as a neutral base line, a new form of whiteness as property was condoned. Material inequities between Blacks and whites -- the product of systematic past and current, formal and informal, mechanisms of racial subordination -- became the norm." ["Whiteness as Property" 106 Harvard L. Rev. 1707 (June 1993), 1753]

I don't know (and I am skeptical) that it is ever possible to create an "equality of starting points." However, in the face of that reality the need to mitigate and ameliorate the unjust effects of unequal starting points has to be a primary goal of a liberal society. If the system is biased against some at the start, it cannot compound its bias by holding the disadvantaged liable for their own failures. At the same time, the government cannot hold everyones hand and refuse to impose any accountability on those who may just not be up to making the grade. Toeing the narrow line between them is hard to do, but it is a task that must be done if we are to truly live in a just society.

2 comments:

  1. At best, the statement that underachievement is a "black cultural problem" doesn't have any bearing on AA. The argument David presents isn't predicated on a "good" black culture. As I read it, the premises in the argument are:

    1) Equality of Opportunity is good
    2) EoO doesn't exist if people have different starting points
    3) AA mitigates problems with EoO due to different starting points

    ---> AA is a justifiable tool

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous11:00 PM

    hip hop culture?
    exploitation of women?
    crap music?
    glorification of violence and drugs?
    inherent black cultural elements?

    Man, have you ever turned on a TV or listened to a radio?

    I don't see them as "inherently black". These are mainstream ideals in the popular culture.

    It's not a black thing, it's a Media thing.

    As Jack wrote, this argument has been made for decades without much attention to causality.

    I've not read a single, credible study on the genetic predisposition of blacks to participate in these social ills.

    Furthermore, the perception that black culture in toto needs reforming is naive.

    You're tagging a race with a label that applies to a portion of the group.

    ReplyDelete