Sunday, October 01, 2006

Most Trusted Institution

This editorial by Charles Dunlap, an Air Force JAG, on the use of the military in civilian law enforcement, is interesting all around. But there was a really intriguing tidbit that I wanted to point out particularly:
Americans don't seem especially worried about increasing the full-time military's role. Despite troubles in Iraq and detainee abuse scandals, polls show that the armed forces are the most trusted institution in American society. Nevertheless, few models exist around the world in which the recurring use of militaries in law enforcement furthers democratic values.

I have to admit, I was a bit surprised to read that the military is "the most trustd institution" in America. Not because I don't hold a high respect for our armed forces. But when I think of states where the military is held in higher esteem than any other institution, I think of states like Turkey--imperfect democracies where the people rely on the military to preserve internal order and are willing to accept some degree of military control over government to do it.

I think this is indicative of a broader American perspective coming into view now, that is rapidly losing its mistrust of centralized authority or power. Times were that Americans were overwhelmingly suspicious of having an army at all--a proposal by Elbridge Gerry to limit the size of the armed forces was defeated only when George Washington demanded a corrallary limiting invading armies to the same size. American's no longer fear loss of liberty, so we've become complacent. The result is the pro-torture and anti-habeas corpus fiasco congress just passed.

H/T: Kenneth Anderson

1 comment:

Disenchanted Dave said...

The military does have a special place in the American psyche. I've always wondered why people get so excited about "the troops," almost to the extent where they don't make a distinction between themselves and "their" (i.e. the government's) army.

Is it because the military is necessary? Why not glorify our sewage workers?

Is it because they're the public face of the nation? Wouldn't it be better if the State Department were our public face?

Is it because they endure great danger so we don't have to? Then why not glorify firefighters?

Is it a particularly noble profession? It hardly seems more noble to me than something like Doctors Without Borders.

The conflation of national identity with a hierarchical, bureaucratic institution of violence is tremendously creepy.