I think health care is fundamental to giving kids a fair chance, but I would like to see a discussion of the wealth level at which a parent should be required to buy their kids some health insurance. The Frosts may not have been at that point, but I do think parents have to take some responsibility for their children's well-being and to make some priorities in regard to it. When I was very little, Mom and Dad lived with two kids in a one-bedroom apartment that got rattled by the train when it went by, but we did have health insurance. They had to do hard things -- my dad was working two jobs and was very rarely around to help my mom deal with two small children; their car was unreliable and their neighborhood not a great one -- and I think that the government should mandate that people make some of those difficult choices in order to provide their children with necessities, including health insurance.
I don't want to see any child go without health insurance, but I also kind of recoil at parents who could hold a job with health benefits for their children (i.e. are educated, hireable and in a decent economy), but choose to start a business or otherwise work without insurance. That I would want the government to interfere in these choices probably marks me as a true statist, but I think once you have chosen to raise children, you've foreclosed some of your other options.
Sometimes lawyer, sometimes law professor, all the time awesome. Assistant Professor, Lewis & Clark Law School.
Follow me on Bluesky: @schraubd.bsky.social
"This is a weblog that is truly welcome in blogtopia — a new blog doesn't seem to be frantically trying to score points for any party. That does NOT mean it's afraid to take a stand or be critical....You really can't predict exactly where The Debate Link will come down on all issues. It's not chanting anyone's mantra." --The Moderate Voice
"[A]n emerging genius in legal scholarship and commentary." --Jim Chen
"It's on my 1st cup of coffee rss feed." --Hanno Kaiser
"I heart this blog.... he referenced Wittgenstein, and it was entirely appropriate and non-pretentious." -- kath.A.rine
The postings on this blog are not legal advice, and should not be construed as such or in any way indicate that the reader and I have formed an attorney/client relationship.
3 comments:
well, what he actually said was almost as bad...
http://www.harvarddems.com/node/2949
And please, everyone keep in mind the political difference between West Iowa and East Iowa.
Had to defend my fair (half) state.
I think health care is fundamental to giving kids a fair chance, but I would like to see a discussion of the wealth level at which a parent should be required to buy their kids some health insurance. The Frosts may not have been at that point, but I do think parents have to take some responsibility for their children's well-being and to make some priorities in regard to it. When I was very little, Mom and Dad lived with two kids in a one-bedroom apartment that got rattled by the train when it went by, but we did have health insurance. They had to do hard things -- my dad was working two jobs and was very rarely around to help my mom deal with two small children; their car was unreliable and their neighborhood not a great one -- and I think that the government should mandate that people make some of those difficult choices in order to provide their children with necessities, including health insurance.
I don't want to see any child go without health insurance, but I also kind of recoil at parents who could hold a job with health benefits for their children (i.e. are educated, hireable and in a decent economy), but choose to start a business or otherwise work without insurance. That I would want the government to interfere in these choices probably marks me as a true statist, but I think once you have chosen to raise children, you've foreclosed some of your other options.
Post a Comment