John Derbyshire lays down the law for Iraqis. Democracy? That's for suckahs! We'll do what we want to do in your "country", because we're big, you're little, and we can.
I am horrified to find myself agreeing with John "hot 15-year-olds" Derbyshire, but I kind of understand his underlying point. It's not so much that he's arguing against Iraqis' democracy, but that he's pointing out that we shouldn't be propping up leaders who don't support us. If Maliki really wants to show how awesomely independent he is of the U.S., let him attempt to run the county without us. (I'm pro-withdrawal, so really, let him attempt to run the country without us. This is what distinguishes me from Derbyshire; he wants the U.S. to remain an occupying force as long as the U.S. wants; I'm happy to leave as soon as the Iraqis indicate they don't want us.)
Well, this is certainly more intellectually honest than the White House (under Bush or McCain) pretending that we're just helping Our Sovereign Allies in Iraq, but refusing to give them a withdrawal timetable like they've, y'know, asked of us.
I mean, I think that Derbyshire's point goes beyond just not propping up "leaders who don't support us [keeping troops indefinitely in their own country]", and onto "we will actively ignore the leaders of countries we are occupying if they want our troops to do things we don't want to do. And our considerations of what we want to do are solely what's good for us, not Iraq."
Sometimes lawyer, sometimes law professor, all the time awesome. Assistant Professor, Lewis & Clark Law School.
Follow me on....
Twitter @schraubd
Bluesky: @schraubd.bsky.social
Threads: @david.schraub
"This is a weblog that is truly welcome in blogtopia — a new blog doesn't seem to be frantically trying to score points for any party. That does NOT mean it's afraid to take a stand or be critical....You really can't predict exactly where The Debate Link will come down on all issues. It's not chanting anyone's mantra." --The Moderate Voice
"[A]n emerging genius in legal scholarship and commentary." --Jim Chen
"It's on my 1st cup of coffee rss feed." --Hanno Kaiser
"I heart this blog.... he referenced Wittgenstein, and it was entirely appropriate and non-pretentious." -- kath.A.rine
The postings on this blog are not legal advice, and should not be construed as such or in any way indicate that the reader and I have formed an attorney/client relationship.
3 comments:
I am horrified to find myself agreeing with John "hot 15-year-olds" Derbyshire, but I kind of understand his underlying point. It's not so much that he's arguing against Iraqis' democracy, but that he's pointing out that we shouldn't be propping up leaders who don't support us. If Maliki really wants to show how awesomely independent he is of the U.S., let him attempt to run the county without us. (I'm pro-withdrawal, so really, let him attempt to run the country without us. This is what distinguishes me from Derbyshire; he wants the U.S. to remain an occupying force as long as the U.S. wants; I'm happy to leave as soon as the Iraqis indicate they don't want us.)
Well, this is certainly more intellectually honest than the White House (under Bush or McCain) pretending that we're just helping Our Sovereign Allies in Iraq, but refusing to give them a withdrawal timetable like they've, y'know, asked of us.
I mean, I think that Derbyshire's point goes beyond just not propping up "leaders who don't support us [keeping troops indefinitely in their own country]", and onto "we will actively ignore the leaders of countries we are occupying if they want our troops to do things we don't want to do. And our considerations of what we want to do are solely what's good for us, not Iraq."
Post a Comment