As a libertarian minded guy, I was not "happy" about the implementation of the TARP program.
As a guy who has done a fair share of studies of US economic history and of previous economic downturns, I saw the necessity of it.
I wouldn't claim to be an expert per se, but anyone who has studies in any depth US econ history, and has looked at the near economic collapse of 1907, it becomes clear that, ultimately, in the absent of a figure such as J P Morgan, the govt had no option but to implement the TARP program. In todays economic structure, not only is there no one of Morgan's wealth and influence over the banking system, what Morgan did to stop certain economic collapse is almost certainly completely against many regulations and / or even the law today.
Also, as much as I appreciate Ron Paul's position on the futile wars in Iraq and Afghanistan (something I once foolishly supported), knowing what I know about 1907, his position on dissolving the Fed is absolutely nuts. Yes the Fed has (and keeps on) screwing up the economy by keeping rates at about zero (hello, anyone remember Japan's stagnant lost economic decade), but it can also act with speed to ensure cash flow and liquid assets remain in the economy. That is what Morgan was able to accomplish in 07.
Sometimes lawyer, sometimes law professor, all the time awesome. Assistant Professor, Lewis & Clark Law School.
Follow me on Bluesky: @schraubd.bsky.social
"This is a weblog that is truly welcome in blogtopia — a new blog doesn't seem to be frantically trying to score points for any party. That does NOT mean it's afraid to take a stand or be critical....You really can't predict exactly where The Debate Link will come down on all issues. It's not chanting anyone's mantra." --The Moderate Voice
"[A]n emerging genius in legal scholarship and commentary." --Jim Chen
"It's on my 1st cup of coffee rss feed." --Hanno Kaiser
"I heart this blog.... he referenced Wittgenstein, and it was entirely appropriate and non-pretentious." -- kath.A.rine
The postings on this blog are not legal advice, and should not be construed as such or in any way indicate that the reader and I have formed an attorney/client relationship.
1 comment:
As a libertarian minded guy, I was not "happy" about the implementation of the TARP program.
As a guy who has done a fair share of studies of US economic history and of previous economic downturns, I saw the necessity of it.
I wouldn't claim to be an expert per se, but anyone who has studies in any depth US econ history, and has looked at the near economic collapse of 1907, it becomes clear that, ultimately, in the absent of a figure such as J P Morgan, the govt had no option but to implement the TARP program. In todays economic structure, not only is there no one of Morgan's wealth and influence over the banking system, what Morgan did to stop certain economic collapse is almost certainly completely against many regulations and / or even the law today.
Also, as much as I appreciate Ron Paul's position on the futile wars in Iraq and Afghanistan (something I once foolishly supported), knowing what I know about 1907, his position on dissolving the Fed is absolutely nuts. Yes the Fed has (and keeps on) screwing up the economy by keeping rates at about zero (hello, anyone remember Japan's stagnant lost economic decade), but it can also act with speed to ensure cash flow and liquid assets remain in the economy. That is what Morgan was able to accomplish in 07.
Post a Comment