Going off my post from yesterday, I'm quoted in today's Bloomsburg Law article about Judge Ho's wild opinion in the mifepristone case -- particularly his ruminations on the "aesthetic injury" pro-life doctors endure from women being allowed to control their own reproduction.
“I absolutely get and agree with the idea that there is something degrading about treating women as, you know, akin to kind of the natural splendor of a sunset,” David Schraub, an constitutional law professor at Lewis & Clark Law School, said noting the criticism Ho’s argument has gotten on social media.
[....]
Schraub said Ho is “a standard-bearer for a new generation of conservative jurists” who recognize and believe in the judiciary as a vanguard for right-wing social change. This generation, he said, isn’t afraid to attack in bold language anyone who’s advocating for a more constrained, traditional view of the judicial role.
Ho “likes the bombast and it’s a very, very common feature of the opinions he writes,” Schraub said.
Not quite sure how I became the mifepristone guy, but here we are.
2 comments:
have you been follow Adam Unikowsky's writing on the subject?
https://adamunikowsky.substack.com/p/the-fifth-circuits-mifepristone-opinion
Yes, it's fabulous.
Post a Comment