well it was cute in a farcial and funny way. As long as you could ridicule it as harmless the teabaggers were fine. When they cross the line from farcial to disturbed its not funny anymore.
A while ago, Amanda at Pandagon argued the use of Holocaust rhetoric to talk about abortion represented a form of Holocaust denial. Not in the sense that they think the historic events were fabricated or falsified but in the sense that they seriously diminish the actual suffering inflicted on actual human beings with the comparisons they draw.
I'd say this sign falls into the same camp, except that much more so. Amazingly more so.
That's been my precise thought about the Israel = Nazis comparison. People who say Gaza is a large concentration camp clearly either don't know or don't comprehend what actually happened in concentration camps. By appropriating the imagery, they are tacitly stripping the Holocaust of its historical reality and mutating it into something new (namely, a political slogan gun for hire).
Sometimes lawyer, sometimes law professor, all the time awesome. Assistant Professor, Lewis & Clark Law School.
Follow me on....
Twitter @schraubd
Bluesky: @schraubd.bsky.social
Threads: @david.schraub
"This is a weblog that is truly welcome in blogtopia — a new blog doesn't seem to be frantically trying to score points for any party. That does NOT mean it's afraid to take a stand or be critical....You really can't predict exactly where The Debate Link will come down on all issues. It's not chanting anyone's mantra." --The Moderate Voice
"[A]n emerging genius in legal scholarship and commentary." --Jim Chen
"It's on my 1st cup of coffee rss feed." --Hanno Kaiser
"I heart this blog.... he referenced Wittgenstein, and it was entirely appropriate and non-pretentious." -- kath.A.rine
The postings on this blog are not legal advice, and should not be construed as such or in any way indicate that the reader and I have formed an attorney/client relationship.
5 comments:
Wait...it was cute to begin with?
well it was cute in a farcial and funny way. As long as you could ridicule it as harmless the teabaggers were fine. When they cross the line from farcial to disturbed its not funny anymore.
Although I hope we can still laugh at teabagging double entendres ("Teabag the liberal Dems before they teabag you!"). Until they get old.
A while ago, Amanda at Pandagon argued the use of Holocaust rhetoric to talk about abortion represented a form of Holocaust denial. Not in the sense that they think the historic events were fabricated or falsified but in the sense that they seriously diminish the actual suffering inflicted on actual human beings with the comparisons they draw.
I'd say this sign falls into the same camp, except that much more so. Amazingly more so.
That's been my precise thought about the Israel = Nazis comparison. People who say Gaza is a large concentration camp clearly either don't know or don't comprehend what actually happened in concentration camps. By appropriating the imagery, they are tacitly stripping the Holocaust of its historical reality and mutating it into something new (namely, a political slogan gun for hire).
Post a Comment