if affirmative action were based on the history of white-afri amer relations it would be much more defensible. However it would be hard to justify having hispanics and asian americans included (not to mention recent african immigrants), and the af am leadership has never felt strong enough to break their coalition with other minorities. So Aff action is based on other, much weaker grounds.
There is also the valid question of how long it should last, and when enough has been done.
Sometimes lawyer, sometimes law professor, all the time awesome. Assistant Professor, Lewis & Clark Law School.
Follow me on Bluesky: @schraubd.bsky.social
"This is a weblog that is truly welcome in blogtopia — a new blog doesn't seem to be frantically trying to score points for any party. That does NOT mean it's afraid to take a stand or be critical....You really can't predict exactly where The Debate Link will come down on all issues. It's not chanting anyone's mantra." --The Moderate Voice
"[A]n emerging genius in legal scholarship and commentary." --Jim Chen
"It's on my 1st cup of coffee rss feed." --Hanno Kaiser
"I heart this blog.... he referenced Wittgenstein, and it was entirely appropriate and non-pretentious." -- kath.A.rine
The postings on this blog are not legal advice, and should not be construed as such or in any way indicate that the reader and I have formed an attorney/client relationship.
1 comment:
if affirmative action were based on the history of white-afri amer relations it would be much more defensible. However it would be hard to justify having hispanics and asian americans included (not to mention recent african immigrants), and the af am leadership has never felt strong enough to break their coalition with other minorities. So Aff action is based on other, much weaker grounds.
There is also the valid question of how long it should last, and when enough has been done.
Post a Comment